bobgroh
05-11-2009, 09:48 AM
On the question of whether the splitter needs to be as thick as the blade, I believe the answer is 'No'. i think the splitter (and the feed pawls) have several purposes:
1. Prevent the wood from skewing and binding the blade
2. Prevent the cut from closing up and binding the blade
3. (via the feed pawls - hope I used the right word there) help prevent backwards movement of the wood (i.e. kickback)
4. If the board does 'rise up', help prevent the moving teeth of the blade from catching the board and flinging it back at you.
None of these require a 'tight' fit of the splitter to the blade size and in fact it would seem that the splitter should certainly be narrower than the saw kerf for sure.
So smaller for sure but not too much so.
Bob Groh, Blue Springs, MO.
1. Prevent the wood from skewing and binding the blade
2. Prevent the cut from closing up and binding the blade
3. (via the feed pawls - hope I used the right word there) help prevent backwards movement of the wood (i.e. kickback)
4. If the board does 'rise up', help prevent the moving teeth of the blade from catching the board and flinging it back at you.
None of these require a 'tight' fit of the splitter to the blade size and in fact it would seem that the splitter should certainly be narrower than the saw kerf for sure.
So smaller for sure but not too much so.
Bob Groh, Blue Springs, MO.